 Standard Oil Company of New Jersey v. United States, (221 US 1), and United States v. American Tobacco Company, (221 US 106), that the act was placed upon its proper basis and the rule of reason governing the application of its principles luminously expounded.  Proceedings of the Louisiana Bar Association - Page 161by Louisiana State Bar Association - 1923Full view - About this book
 | United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - Courts - 1948 - 990 pages
...328 US 408, 412-427. 9Compare, eg, United States v. EC Knight Co., 156 US 1, with Standard Oil Co. v. United States, 221 US 1, and United States v. American Tobacco Co., 221 US 106; Hammer v. Dagenhart, 247 US 251, with United States v. Darby, 312 US 100; Carter v.... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1920 - 1058 pages
...objection to the criminal operation of the statute is thought to be warranted by 'Standard Oil Co. v. United States, 221 US 1, and United States v. American Tobacco Co., 221 US 100. Those cases may be taken to have establishe'd that only such contracts and combinations... | |
 | Joseph Asbury Joyce - Antitrust law - 1911 - 870 pages
...AfUnincorporated Associa- fected by Constitution of tions. Union. 539. Statute as to Labels and Stamps. APPENDIX A Standard Oil Company of New Jersey v. United States, 221 US 1 Headnotes (Official) Opinion 7 /rur • 11 rZ A- /-*_• • r (Offic1al) Dissent1ng Op1n1on > United... | |
 | United States. Courts - Corporation law - 1928 - 1244 pages
...Cincinnati Packet Company v. Bay, 200 US 179. The view was fully confirmed in Standard Oil Company v. United States, 221 US 1, and United States v. American Tobacco Company, 221 US 106, where the language of the Federal statute was read in the light of the common law, and in accordance... | |
 | Law - 1914 - 800 pages
...latest construction of this Act, by the Supreme Court of the United States, in the Standard Oil Compuny v. United States, 221 US 1, and United States v. American Tobacco Company, 221 US 106, is that "it prohibits all contracts and combination which amount to an unreasonable or undue restraint... | |
 | 1914 - 584 pages
...there have been two exhaustive opinions of the Supreme Court dealing with this act; Standard Oil Co. v. United States, 221 U. S. 1 ; and United States v. American Tobacco Co., 221 US 106. The effect of these would seem to be that contracts and methods of business, which... | |
 | Floyd Barzilia Clark - Biography & Autobiography - 1915 - 234 pages
...there were sufficient constitutional grounds for not doing so: In the cases of the Standard Oil Company v. United States, 221 US 1, and United States v. American Tobacco Co., 221 US 106, much of the action of the court was not necessary for the decision of the case. Instead... | |
 | Constitutional law - 1915 - 652 pages
...there were sufficient constitutional grounds for not doing so. In the cases of the Standard Oil Company v. United States, 221 US 1, and United States v. American Tobacco Co., 221 US 106, much of the action of the court was not necessary for the decision of the case. Instead... | |
 | Harold Edgar Barnes - Constitutional law - 1915 - 376 pages
...forbidden by the Act of Congress, as construed and applied by this court in the cases of Standard Oil Co. v. United States, 221 US 1, and United States v. American Tobacco Co., 221 US 106, will depend upon the intent to be inferred from the extent of the control thereby... | |
 | William Lee Raymond - Bonds - 1916 - 348 pages
...prevailed in England from the Middle Ages to 1844. (Public Service Regulation, February 15, 1915, p. 99.) 1 Standard Oil Company of New Jersey v. United States, 221 US 1 (1911); United States v. American Tobacco Company, 221 US 106 (1911). of illegality the injury of the... | |
| |
