Reports of Cases in Law and Equity in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Volume 67Gould, Banks & Gould, 1889 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 75
Page 24
... error . The question of equities between any of the prior parties to a certified check cannot intervene against a bona fide holder for value . He deals upon the paper alone , looking to the bank as the primary debtor . Nolan v . Bank of ...
... error . The question of equities between any of the prior parties to a certified check cannot intervene against a bona fide holder for value . He deals upon the paper alone , looking to the bank as the primary debtor . Nolan v . Bank of ...
Page 27
... error . 1. As no grounds of the objection were stated , it was er- ror to sustain it , if the evidence or fact sought to be proved was material or proper for any purpose . ( 45 N. Y. Rep . , 753. 12 id . , 442 , 451. 7 Bosworth , 481 ...
... error . 1. As no grounds of the objection were stated , it was er- ror to sustain it , if the evidence or fact sought to be proved was material or proper for any purpose . ( 45 N. Y. Rep . , 753. 12 id . , 442 , 451. 7 Bosworth , 481 ...
Page 29
... of Mrs. Nolan's owner- ship was a question of law , and not of fact , and , there- fore , no error was committed by the court in refusing Nolan v . Bank of New York National Banking Association NEW YORK - NOVEMBER , 1873 . 29.
... of Mrs. Nolan's owner- ship was a question of law , and not of fact , and , there- fore , no error was committed by the court in refusing Nolan v . Bank of New York National Banking Association NEW YORK - NOVEMBER , 1873 . 29.
Page 43
... DEPARTMENT , GENERAL TERM at New York , November , 1873 . Ingraham , Fancher and Davis , Justices . ] ( a ) Affirmed by Court of Appeals . 56 N. Y. , 533 . WIGHTMAN , plaintiff in error , vs. THE PEOPLE , NEW YORK - NOVEMBER , 1873 . 43.
... DEPARTMENT , GENERAL TERM at New York , November , 1873 . Ingraham , Fancher and Davis , Justices . ] ( a ) Affirmed by Court of Appeals . 56 N. Y. , 533 . WIGHTMAN , plaintiff in error , vs. THE PEOPLE , NEW YORK - NOVEMBER , 1873 . 43.
Page 44
Oliver Lorenzo Barbour. WIGHTMAN , plaintiff in error , vs. THE PEOPLE , defendants in error . A prisoner under indictment can admit , as testimony to be considered by the jury , on the trial , depositions of non - resident witnesses ...
Oliver Lorenzo Barbour. WIGHTMAN , plaintiff in error , vs. THE PEOPLE , defendants in error . A prisoner under indictment can admit , as testimony to be considered by the jury , on the trial , depositions of non - resident witnesses ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accept accord and satisfaction action was brought Affirmed agent agreement alleged amount answer appear attorney authority Bank Barb bond Brady and Daniels cause of action charge cheese claimed codicil complaint contract corporation costs counsel court court of equity creditor damages dant debt defendant defendant's delivered delivery denied discharge duty Dyke entitled evidence executed fact favor fendant given ground held hoops Hudson River indorsed injury intestate issue judge judgment jury Justices land liability lien matter Mayor &c ment Morse mortgage motion notice objection offered Onderdonk Overruled owner paid paper parties payment person plaintiff possession premises proceedings promissory note proof purchase question R. R. Co railroad received recover referee Reversed Samuel White Special Term Speyer statute Syracuse testator testified testimony thereof tiff tion trial trust verdict Wend wife witness wood York
Popular passages
Page 55 - Ed.) § 452, that the principal is to be 'held liable to third persons in a civil suit for the frauds, deceits, concealments, misrepresentations, torts, negligences and other malfeasances or misfeasances and omissions of duty of his agent In the course of his employment, although the principal did not authorize, or Justify or participate In, or indeed know of such misconduct, or even if he forbade the acts or disapproved of them.
Page 546 - By marriage, the husband and wife are one person in law: that is, the very being or legal existence of the woman is suspended during the marriage, or at least is incorporated and consolidated into that of the husband...
Page 69 - Where any building, which is leased or occupied, is destroyed or so injured by the elements, or any other cause as to be untenantable, and unfit for occupancy, and no express agreement to the contrary has been made in writing, the lessee or occupant may, if the destruction or injury occurred without his fault or neglect, quit and surrender possession of the leasehold premises...
Page 262 - ... shall be jointly and severally liable for all the debts of the company, then existing, and for all that shall be contracted before such report shall be made.
Page 368 - ... that nothing in this provision shall be taken to alter, take away or lessen the effect of a part payment of principal or interest ; and it may be contended that the effect of these two sections is to exclude all parol evidence whatever bearing upon an acknowledgment or new promise...
Page 481 - Every action must be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest, except that an executor or administrator, a trustee of an express trust, or a person expressly authorized by statute, may sue, without joining with him the person for whose benefit the action is prosecuted. A person, with whom or in whose name, a contract is made for the benefit of another, is a trustee of an express trust, within the meaning of this section.
Page 262 - If the directors of any such company shall declare and pay any dividend, when the company is insolvent, or any dividend the payment of which would render it insolvent, they shall be jointly and severally liable for all the debts of the company then existing, and for all that shall be thereafter contracted so long as they shall respectively continue in office...
Page 547 - When the action is between herself and her husband, she may sue or be sued alone; 3.
Page 546 - One reason for which may be this: that the inferior hath no kind of property in the company, care, or assistance of the superior, as the superior is held to have in those of the inferior; and therefore the inferior can suffer no loss or injury...
Page 368 - No acknowledgment or promise shall be sufficient evidence of a new or continuing contract, whereby to take the case out of the operation of this title, unless the same be contained in some •writing signed by the party to be charged thereby; but this section shall not alter the effect of any payment of principal or interest.