Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Judicature of the State of Indiana, Volume 61Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy Bobbs-Merrill Company, 1879 - Law reports, digests, etc "With tables of the cases and principal matters" (varies). |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
administrator affidavit aforesaid alleged error appellant appellee appellee's complaint assessment attorney averment bill of exceptions board of commissioners bond Boone county Bowen cars cause of action cents Cincinnati and St Circuit Court civil township claim Clarksville contract copy costs counsel court erred Crawfordsville damages deceased decedent decision defendant demurrer denial duly election endorsed entitled et ux evidence ex rel execution facts fence fendant filed Gregg held hundred dollars Indiana issued John Holloway Joshua Harris jury Kentland land ment mortgage note in suit notice objection opinion overruled paid paragraph of answer parties payee payment person Pittsburgh plaintiff pleaded promissory note purchase question real estate record refused rendered road Robert Crandall rule second paragraph sheriff Simeon K statute staves sued sufficient surety sustained term therein thereof thereto tion town of Clarksville township trial trustees verdict
Popular passages
Page 268 - America, for the payment of which well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors and administrators, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.
Page 414 - An act to revise, simplify, and abridge the rules, practice, pleadings, and forms in civil cases in the courts of this State ; to abolish distinct forms of action at law ; and to provide for the administration of justice, in a uniform mode of pleading and practice, without distinction between law and equity," approved June 18, 1852 ; Which was read the first time, and passed to a second reading.
Page 178 - VII. The seventh and last rule or canon is, that in collateral inheritances the male stocks shall be preferred to the female (that is, kindred derived from the blood of the male ancestors, however remote, shall be admitted before those from the blood of the female however near),- — unless where the lands have, in fact, descended from a female.
Page 407 - The inhabitants of the said territory, shall always be entitled to the benefits of the writ of habeas corpus, and of the trial by jury; of a proportionate representation of the people in the legislature, and of judicial proceedings according to the course of the common law.
Page 224 - Drink no longer water, but use a little wine for thy stomach's sake and thine often infirmities.
Page 264 - ... have retired for deliberation, if there be a disagreement between them as to any part of the testimony, or if they desire to be informed of any point of law arising in the cause, they may require the officer to conduct them into court. Upon their being brought into court, the information required must be given in the presence of, or after notice to, the parties or counsel.
Page 591 - The writ of mandamus may be denominated the writ of mandate.— 1873-345. 1085. It may be issued by any court, except a justice's or police court, to any inferior tribunal, corporation, board, or person, to compel the performance of an act which the law specially enjoins, as a duty resulting from an office, trust, or station...
Page 47 - The test," says Judge Duncan in Swan v. Scott, 11 Serg. & R. 164, "whether a demand connected with an illegal transaction is capable of being enforced at law, is whether the plaintiff requires the aid of the illegal transaction to establish his case.
Page 407 - That the following articles shall be considered as articles of compact between the original states, and the people and states, in the said territory, and forever remain unalterable, unless by common consent, to wit: ARTICLE I.
Page 339 - Where a special finding of facts shall be inconsistent with the general verdict, the former shall control the latter, and the court shall give judgment accordingly.