CASES DECIDED IN THE CIRCUIT AND DISTRICT COURTS OF THE UNITED STATES WITHIN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO HUMPHREY H. LEAVITT JUDGE By LEWIS H. BOND Counselor at Law VOLUME II CINCINNATI 1872 Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year one thousand eight hundred and seventy-two, By LEWIS H. BOND, In the office of the Librarian of Congress at Washington. L1IRA?Y OF THE LAW DEPARTMENT. TABLE OF CASES. Alexander-Goshorn v........ Fowler-Vore v.................. 294 159 | Fifty-three Boxes Havana 287 | Sugar-U. S. v................ 346 181 H. 13 16 147 B. Beard v. Bowler................. Blanchard v. Puttman......... 84 Grotenkemper-U. S. v....... 140 Brammer v. Jones............. 100 Goshorn v. Alexander......... 159 Bailey v. Wright............... Goodyear v. Berry .............. 189 Berry-Goodyear v............. 189 Brown-Ware v.................. 267 Brawley and Golden v. Steamboat Jim Watson.... 356 Hammer v. Kaufman..... Holenshade-Schwarzel v.... 29 of.................................. 210 Cobb-McCloskey v.......... Haughey v. Albin............... 244 Chaffee-U. S. v ................. Harries-U. S. v................. 311 Chaffee-U. S. v. 110 Hoeltge v. Hoeller.............. 387 Central Ohio Railroad v. Hickenlooper-Erdhouse v.. 392 Thompson........ Hoeller-Hoeltge v............. 387 Cantner-U. S. v. 389 D. Dunlevy v. Mowry............... 214 In the matter of Holenshade 210 Dustin--U. S. v. ................. 332 In the matter of Manly........ 261 Sons............................... 336 Ex parte Ross.................... 252 In the matter of Reece and Eight Hundred Caddies of Brother........................... 359 Tobacco-U. S. v.............. 305 Erdhouse v. Hickenlooper... J. Jones-Brammer v............ 100 Five Hundred Barrels of Jorey and Sons-In the Whisky-U. S. V............ 71 matter of ............... ............. 336 296 E. 392 92025 356 McCloskey v. Cobb.............. Morris—U. S. v.................. Moore-U. S. v ................. McClelland-Pease v.......... Mowry-Whitney V............ Morris v. Royer................... Moore-National Exchange Bank v.......... 170 Mason-U. S. v................... Mowry—Dunlevy v............. Manly-In the matter of..... 261 Steamboat Homeyer-U. S. v. 217 Rusk v............................ 234 -U. S. V............ 271, 281, 285 Smith-Harrison & Groom v. 320 Smith-U. S. v................... 323 Sundry Boxes of Havana Sugar-U. S. v................. 342 Brawley and Golden v...... T. Railroad v. ..................... 296 Cheeseman v................... 363 Turner-U. S. v.................. 379 Two Hundred and Fifty-six Barrels of Beer-U. S. v... 395 183 214 N. 20 National Exchange Bank v. 0. P. Puttman-Blanchard v........ R. Roback v. Taylor................ .......... U. dred Barrels of Whisky... 7 United States v. Morris....... 23 United States v. Robert Moore......... .............. United States v. Kenton...... United States v. Chaffee...... 110 Hogsheads of Tobacco...... ......... 140 United States v. Mason....... 183 29 United States v. Steamboat 115 Homeyer........................ 217 | United States v. Seventy37 | eight Cases of Books, 271,281,285 137 S. Schwarzel v. Holenshade...... Co-U. S. v......... 399 United States v. Eight Hun dred and Fifty-six Barrels dred Caddies of Tobacco... 305 of Beer........................... 395 United States v. Harries...... 311 | United States v. One DistilUnited States v. Smith........ 323 lery, etc. United States v. Dustin....... 332 United States v. Thorpe...... 340 m . .. United States v. Sundry Vore v. Fowler................... 294 Boxes of Havana Sugar.... 342 United States v. Fifty-three W. Boxes of Havana Sugar.... 346 Whitney v. Mowry.............. United States v. Turner...... 379 Whisen-Swift v......... United States v. Cantner..... 389 Wright-Bailey v............ 181 United States v. Two Hun | Ware v. Brown ................. 267 45 APPENDIX. ............... ...419 ..... 436 Expression of Regard by the Bar of the Southern District of Ohio, for Judge Leavitt, upon his retirement from the bench............ 407 Rules of the Circuit Court of the United States, within the South ern District of Ohio...... Rules of the Circuit Court of the United States within the South ern District of Ohio, in BANKRUPTCY...... Rules of the District Court of the United States within the Southern District of Ohio, in BANKRUPTCY. .............. Rules of the District Court of the United States within the Southern District of Ohio, in PROCEEDINGS IN REM. ............. New Rules of the Supreme Court of the United States, adopted 1872.............. ................... 453 Act of Congress dividing the State of Ohio into two Judicial Districts..... .............. 457 449 . |