Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Alabama, Volume 2 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 18
Page 15
REUBEN SAFFOLD , ANDERSON CRENSHAW , JOHN M . TAYLOR , JOHN
WHITE , SION L . PERRY , AND HENRY W , COLLIER , JUDGES . WALLIS V .
MURPHY . An affidavit that a party is about to remove himself out of the county of
his ...
REUBEN SAFFOLD , ANDERSON CRENSHAW , JOHN M . TAYLOR , JOHN
WHITE , SION L . PERRY , AND HENRY W , COLLIER , JUDGES . WALLIS V .
MURPHY . An affidavit that a party is about to remove himself out of the county of
his ...
Page 17
... shewn to be a son - in - law to the testator : Held , that he was an incompetent
witness ; though there was no further proof as to his interest . This was an action
of detinue , brought in the Circuit Court of Tuscaloosa county , in 1822 , by John
M ...
... shewn to be a son - in - law to the testator : Held , that he was an incompetent
witness ; though there was no further proof as to his interest . This was an action
of detinue , brought in the Circuit Court of Tuscaloosa county , in 1822 , by John
M ...
Page 55
daimed by John Hobbs , who made affidavit and gave bond , JULY 1 29 . accor .
ing to statute . ... negroes were liable to the satisfaction of his execution as the
property of John Estell , and Hobbs denving the same , and insisting they were
his .
daimed by John Hobbs , who made affidavit and gave bond , JULY 1 29 . accor .
ing to statute . ... negroes were liable to the satisfaction of his execution as the
property of John Estell , and Hobbs denving the same , and insisting they were
his .
Page 111
John R . Lucas , filed his Bill in Equity , in Madison Circuit Court , in August , 1827
, against John P . Hickman , for a ne exeat . He set forth that in 1819 , Pope and
Hickman as copartners , became indebted to the firm of Nance & Co . in $ 6662 ...
John R . Lucas , filed his Bill in Equity , in Madison Circuit Court , in August , 1827
, against John P . Hickman , for a ne exeat . He set forth that in 1819 , Pope and
Hickman as copartners , became indebted to the firm of Nance & Co . in $ 6662 ...
Page 119
Martin FRYER , as administrator of John Fryer , deceased , filed his bill in equity
in Monroe Circuit Court , in August , 1924 , against Jeremiah Austill , as surviviug
partner of the film of Files and Austill , and against John Yancy , former sheriff of ...
Martin FRYER , as administrator of John Fryer , deceased , filed his bill in equity
in Monroe Circuit Court , in August , 1924 , against Jeremiah Austill , as surviviug
partner of the film of Files and Austill , and against John Yancy , former sheriff of ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action administrator admitted agreement alleged amount answer appear appellant apply assigned authority bank bill bond brought cause Chancery charged Circuit Court circumstances claim common complainant consideration considered constitution contract costs County Court Court creditors debt decision decree deed defendant determined effect election entitled equity error evidence exceptions execution expressed fact favor firm fraud further give given ground held intended interest issue JANUARY John Judge judgment JULY jurisdiction jury justice land Lucas matter ment necessary notice objection obtained opinion original paid parties payment person plaintiff plea pleaded possession present principle proceedings promise proof prove purchase question reason received record recover referred rendered reversed rule seal sheriff shew statute sufficient suit sustained taken term tion trial void witness writ
Popular passages
Page 361 - The inhabitants of the said territory, shall always be entitled to the benefits of the writ of habeas corpus, and of the trial by jury; of a proportionate representation of the people in the legislature, and of judicial proceedings according to the course of the common law.
Page 87 - Morrell of the first part, and the town of North Hempstead in Queens County and State of New York, of the second part, witnesseth, that the said parties of the first part for and in consideration of the sum of one dollar lawful money of the United States of America, to them in hand paid by the said party of the second part, at or before the ensealing and delivery of these presents, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged...
Page 143 - Where a law is plain and unambiguous, whether it be expressed in general or limited terms, the Legislature should be intended to mean what they have plainly expressed, and consequently no room is left for construction.
Page 310 - Where a court has jurisdiction, it has a right to decide every question which occurs in the cause ; and whether its decision be correct or otherwise, its judgment, until reversed, is regarded as binding in every other court. But if it act without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void.
Page 25 - no action shall be brought whereby to charge the defendant upon any special promise to answer for the debt, default, or miscarriage of another person, unless the agreement upon which such action shall be brought, or some memorandum or note thereof, shall be in writing, and signed by the party to be charged therewith, or some other person thereunto by him lawfully authorized.
Page 238 - Every male person subject to none of the foregoing disqualifications, who shall have attained the age of twenty-one years, and who shall be a citizen of the United States, and...
Page 239 - In all criminal prosecutions the accused shall enjoy the right to be heard by himself and counsel; to demand the nature and cause of the accusation against him; to meet the witnesses face to face; to have compulsory process to compel the attendance of witnesses in his behalf; and in prosecutions by indictment, or information, to a speedy public trial by an impartial jury of the county or district wherein the offense shall have been committed; which county or district shall have been previously ascertained...
Page 315 - To give any binding effect to a judgment, it is essential that the court should have jurisdiction of the person, and of the subject matter; and the want of jurisdiction is a matter that may always be set up against a judgment, when sought to be enforced, or when any benefit is claimed under it. The want of jurisdiction makes it utterly void and unavailable for any purpose.
Page 206 - The test," says Judge Duncan in Swan v. Scott, 11 Serg. & R. 164, "whether a demand connected with an illegal transaction is capable of being enforced at law, is whether the plaintiff requires the aid of the illegal transaction to establish his case.
Page 88 - ... have granted, bargained, sold, assigned, transferred and set over, and by these presents do grant, bargain...
Bibliographic information
| Title | Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Alabama, Volume 2 |
| Authors | Alabama. Supreme Court, George Noble Stewart |
| Publisher | D. Ferguson, printer, 1832 |
| Original from | Harvard University |
| Digitized | 2 Aug 2007 |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |