Page images
PDF
EPUB
[blocks in formation]
[merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

AND

THEOLOGICAL REVIEW.

NO. I.-JANUARY, 1834.

INTRODUCTORY ARTICLE.

BY THE EDITOR.

It is remarked by Frederick Schlegel, in his delineation of Mohammedanism,* that the sects existing within its pale, did not originate in any mysteries of faith, or points of doctrine, but in the claims of rival aspirants after the throne of Mohammed. The war by which Mohammed himself was first driven from Mecca, and the controversy after his death between Ali and Abubecker, which led to a schism among his followers not as yet healed, were personal, and not doctrinal, in their origin. The same is true in general, though perhaps in a less degree, of the sects into which the believers in other false religions are divided. "Quarrels and divisions about religion," says Lord Bacon, "were evils unknown to the heathen. The reason was, because the religion of the heathen, consisted rather in rites and ceremonies, than in any constant belief." But in Christendom the case is far otherwise; and though it has been divided into different communions on questions of discipline and polity, yet the greater number and most important of its parties may be traced to at least a professed interest for the doctrines of the Christian faith.

This fact furnishes an honourable characteristic of Christianity; and while the number and the violence of its sects are made a ground of reproach against our religion, it ought still to be remembered, by way of alleviation, that these sects do not spring from the grovelling and merely worldly interests by which feuds and divisions are elsewhere produced, but rather from an interest in itself so noble and refined, as concern for the articles of one's creed, for matters of faith and doctrine. These are so remote from the lower necessi

VOL. I.

*Philosophie der Geschichte. Vol. ii. pp. 87, 88.
1

« PreviousContinue »