 | Encyclopedias and dictionaries - 1919 - 904 pages
...McReynolds. Four justices dissented: Holmes, Brandéis, Clarke, and McKenna. Justice Holmes declared, "The act does not meddle with anything belonging to...State line they are no longer within their rights." Plans were at once begun to renew the restrictions under some other power of Congress, such as the... | |
 | Child labor - 1917 - 848 pages
...of the domestic policy of any State." And, again, summing up his dissent, Mr. Justice Holmes says: "The act does not meddle with anything belonging to...state line they are no longer within their rights." In regulating interstate commerce, Congress "may cany out its views of public policy whatever indirect... | |
 | Michigan State Bar Association - 1917 - 662 pages
...necessary, to say that it is permissible as against strong and not as against the product of ruined lives. The act does not meddle with anything belonging to the states. They may regulate and inter-link affairs and their domestic commerce as they like, but when they seek to send their products... | |
 | Electronic journals - 1918 - 508 pages
...federal authority does not extend." The view of the minority is thus expressed by Mr. Justice Holmes : "The act does not meddle with anything belonging to...their rights. If there were no Constitution and no » Scharrenberg v. Dollar SS Co. (1917), 245 US 122, 126, 38 Sup. Ct. 28. 12 The government has published... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1918 - 628 pages
...against strong drink but not as against the product of ruined lives. 251. HOLMES, .!., dissenting. The act does not meddle with anything belonging to...commerce as they like. But when they seek to send then- products across the state line they are no longer within their rights. If there were no Constitution... | |
 | Encyclopedias and dictionaries - 1919 - 896 pages
...McRcynolds. Four justices dissented: Holmes, Brandéis, Clarke, and McKenna. Justice Holmes declared, "The act does not meddle with anything belonging to...State line they are no longer within their rights." Plans were at once begun to renew the restrictions under some other power of Congress, such as the... | |
 | 1919 - 926 pages
...destroyed." The reply of Justice Holmes to this contention is incisive, fundamental and complete : " The act does not meddle with anything belonging to...States. They may regulate their internal affairs and domestic concerns as much as they like. But when they seek to send their products across the State... | |
 | 1919 - 888 pages
...McReynolds. Four justices dissented: Holmes, Brandéis, Clarke, and McKenna. Justice Holmes declared, "The act does not meddle with anything belonging to the States. They may regulate their internal affaira and their domestic commerce as they like. But when they seek to send their products across... | |
 | Robert Eugene Cushman - Constitutional law - 1920 - 180 pages
...dissenting opinion, 247 US at p. 279. And finally, the law does not interfere with any power reserved to the states. "They may regulate their internal affairs...state line they are no longer within their rights. . . . The public policy of the United States is shaped with a view to the benefit of the nation as... | |
 | Railroads - 1922 - 710 pages
...producl of ruined lives. "This does not meddle with anything be longing to the states. They may regulaM their Internal affairs and their domestic commerce as they like. But when they seei to send their products across the state line they are no longer within their rights. II there... | |
| |
The act does not meddle with anything belonging to the States. They may regulate their internal affairs and their domestic commerce as they like. But when they seek to send their products across the State line they are no longer within their rights. 
