Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court And, at Law, in the Court of Errors and Appeals of the State of New Jersey, Volume 17Soney and Sage, 1877 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 72
Page 35
... received ; for though we might happen individually to be acquainted with the land , yet without evidence of the location and value of the land , such disproportion could never be judi- cially taken notice of , and acted upon by the ...
... received ; for though we might happen individually to be acquainted with the land , yet without evidence of the location and value of the land , such disproportion could never be judi- cially taken notice of , and acted upon by the ...
Page 54
... received is to have a remedy some where , and no other tribunal is named or known where that redress is to be sought , this Court by its general superintending powers over other tribunals , must be the place where the party injured is ...
... received is to have a remedy some where , and no other tribunal is named or known where that redress is to be sought , this Court by its general superintending powers over other tribunals , must be the place where the party injured is ...
Page 59
... received by the Commissioner de bene esse , is liable here to all legal exceptions . The statute , passed 7 June , 1799 , requires that a deed , together with the acknowledgments or proofs , shall be first recorded word for word , with ...
... received by the Commissioner de bene esse , is liable here to all legal exceptions . The statute , passed 7 June , 1799 , requires that a deed , together with the acknowledgments or proofs , shall be first recorded word for word , with ...
Page 64
... receiving our knowledge of the fact as we do at second hand , are perhaps even more liable There is nothing which would justify us in saying that to err . New - Jersey Rail Road and Tr . Co. v 64 NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT .
... receiving our knowledge of the fact as we do at second hand , are perhaps even more liable There is nothing which would justify us in saying that to err . New - Jersey Rail Road and Tr . Co. v 64 NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT .
Page 79
... received the purchase money . It was not necessary to produce Fifield himself , even if he had been disposed to come . If fraud , or collusion were alleged , it was the duty of Obart to prove it . For the rejection of this evidence ...
... received the purchase money . It was not necessary to produce Fifield himself , even if he had been disposed to come . If fraud , or collusion were alleged , it was the duty of Obart to prove it . For the rejection of this evidence ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action affidavit agreement Amboy appear appointed assessment assigned assumpsit attorney authority award bail bill Bordentown Brittin cause Certiorari charge cited Commissioners common law Common Pleas Company contract costs counsel count court damages David Combs death debt declaration defendant defendant's deforcement demand demurrer devise discount dollars dower evidence execution executor executor or administrator fact fendant filed Freeman adsm Haines Halst heir HORNBLOWER husband indorser intestate John judges judgment jury Justice land legislature Matlack ment Mickle Morris Canal NEVIUS New-Jersey Rail Road notice oath objection opinion paid party payment person Peter Davison plaintiff plaintiff in error plead present principle proceedings promissory note prove question recover refused rendered Road and Tr Robert McKeen rule scire facias sheriff signed Sinnickson slave statute statute of Merton suit surveyors Suydam term testator testator's thereof tion tout temps prist trial usury verdict widow witnesses Woodruff