Cases Argued and Adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, Volume 10; Volume 77W.H. & O.H. Morrison, 1871 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 84
Page 17
... answer to the libel , here excepted to the jurisdiction of the District Court over the cargo of cotton , because it was the property of the United States , and could not be made subject to process in that court , nor VOL . X. * 7 ...
... answer to the libel , here excepted to the jurisdiction of the District Court over the cargo of cotton , because it was the property of the United States , and could not be made subject to process in that court , nor VOL . X. * 7 ...
Page 47
... answer , in which they admit that the complainants . made the offer in writing , as required by their charter , to construct the railroad , and that they took possession of one or more of the streets of the city for that purpose ; that ...
... answer , in which they admit that the complainants . made the offer in writing , as required by their charter , to construct the railroad , and that they took possession of one or more of the streets of the city for that purpose ; that ...
Page 48
... answer call for the interposition of the court to protect their rights as though they were complainants asking relief in the premises , and they pray that the answer may stand as a cross - bill , and that the mayor and board of aldermen ...
... answer call for the interposition of the court to protect their rights as though they were complainants asking relief in the premises , and they pray that the answer may stand as a cross - bill , and that the mayor and board of aldermen ...
Page 50
... answer . They insist that the exclusive right to construct railroads for the transportation of passengers over the streets of that city , and to use the streets of the city for that purpose , was granted by the city authorities to cer ...
... answer . They insist that the exclusive right to construct railroads for the transportation of passengers over the streets of that city , and to use the streets of the city for that purpose , was granted by the city authorities to cer ...
Page 51
... answer in damages if they refuse the use of the same , without any reasonable excuse , upon being paid or tendered the usual fare . * IV . Consonant with that view this court held , in the case of the Bank of Augusta v . Earle , † that ...
... answer in damages if they refuse the use of the same , without any reasonable excuse , upon being paid or tendered the usual fare . * IV . Consonant with that view this court held , in the case of the Bank of Augusta v . Earle , † that ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
act of Congress affirmed agent alleged amount answer appeal Argument authority bank bill bonds Brobst brought cashier cause cent certificates certified checks checks Chiles Circuit Court claim common law complainant contract corporation County court of equity declared decree deed defendant delivered the opinion District Court duties effect equity evidence execution fact filed given gold gold certificates grant Grapeshot Hanrick Hardenberg held Howard injunction interest invoice issued judgment jurisdiction jury Justice land libel lien marble matter Mellen ment Merchants Milwaukee River mortgage navigable owner paid parties patent payment person petition plaintiff in error possession proceedings purchase question Railroad Company record refused Ripley river rule sell Stat Statement statute steamer suit supersedeas Supreme Court Texas tion tract transaction Trimble United validity vessel Wabash Railroad Wallace writ of error