Edmondson et al. v. Corn et al... 17 Hutts v. Hutts Edwards v. The State..
Edwards v. Town of Columbia City.....
Edwards v. Trittipo...
Hyatt et al., Morgan v.......
121 Indianapolis and Vincennes R. R. Co. v. McCaffrey...
Elliott, American Ins. Co. v........211 Emmert, Johns v..
English et al., Reeder v...... Etchison Ditching Ass'n, Busen- bark v. Etchison Ditching Ass'n, Jerrell
Evansville and Crawfordsville R. R. Co. v. Beard........ Evansville and Crawfordsville R. R. Co. v. Haddon.................. .
533 Indianapolis and Vincennes R. R. Co. v. McClaren, Adm'r......566 Indianapolis, Peru and Chicago R. W. Co. v. Goar....... Indianapolis, Peru and Chicago R. W. Co. v. Maguire Indianapolis, Peru and Chicago R. W. Co. v. Negley.......... .210 Irwin, Adm'r, Stearns et ux. v.....558 .209 Jackson et al., Dawson et al. v.....171 213 Jacoby et al., Henline v.............298 Jarvis v. Shelby Township, of Jefferson Co........
Fager v. The State..... Feeley, Hinsey et ux. v.............. 85 Fidler, Ex'r, Cann et al. v.................... Field et al., Johnston v.......... 377 Jennings, Price et al. v.......
145 Johnson, Branham et al. v... Frank et al., Halfman et ux. v......212 Johnston v. Field et al
Franklin, City of, et al., Tarlton v..212 Jones v. City of Columbus et al...421 Furber, Wallace v ............103 Joyce v. First Nat'l Bank of
State, Ready v .................. ......... ......................................209 | Tolen, Beck v.....
331 Town of Kentland et al., Kent v..291
Stevens et al., Barnés et al. v.......226 Trippet et al., Jerauld v.......... 122 Stewart et al. v. Armel et al........593 Trittipo, Edwards v.......... Stewart et al. v. Muse........
Stone, Ex'r, et al., Coryell et al. v.307 Stryker, Sibbitt v... Sullivan, Guardian, Bowen et al. v.281 Swain v. Bartlow........... Taggart, Buckley et al. v............ 236 Tarlton v. City of Franklin et al..212 Taylor et ux. v. Watkins............ 511 Taylor, Guardian, Brown et al. v..295 Teagle et al., Ford v
Thompson, Louisville, New Al- bany and Chicago R. W. Co.
Thompson, The State v.........
Toledo, Wabash and Western R.
W. Co. v. Craft..
Abdil v. Abdil, 26 Ind. 287... .403| Beedle v. State, 62 Ind. 26........... 598 Acebal v. Levy, 10 Bing. 376.......490 Bellefontaine R. W. Co. v. Hunter, Achey v. Stephens, 8 Ind. 411...... 313 33 Ind. 335. Adams v. Cosby, 48 Ind. 153.......263 Bellows v. Lovell, 5 Pick. 307......125 Adams, Ex parte, 25 Miss. 883.....493 Bennifield v. Hypres, 38 Ind. 498...561 Adams Ex. Co. v. Black, 62 Ind. Benton v. Shreeve, 4 Ind. 66.. ..174 Berkshire v. Young, 45 Ind. 461...367 Bertenshaw v. Moffitt, 6 Ind. 464..174 Billingsley v. Stratton, 11 Ind.
353 Booher v. Goldsborough, 44 Ind. 490
128... ...207
Adams Ex. Co. v.Hill, 43 Ind.157. 273
Addington v. Wilson, 5 Ind. 137..313
Agee v. Steele, 8 Ala. 948...........125
Ainsworth v. Atkinson, 14 Ind.
538
....315
Alcock v. Hill, 4 Leigh, 622...... ..125
330
Aldridge v. Dunn, 7 Blackf. 249...206 Board, etc., v. State, 15 Ind. 250...182
Alexander v. Herbert, 60 Ind. 184. 97 Boardman v. Spooner, 13 Allen,
Alkire v. Timmons Ditching Co.,
51 Ind. 71.......
.201, 315
Allard v. Greasert, 61 N. Y. 1..490, 592
Allen v. Anderson, 57 Ind. 388.... 61
Alspaugh v. Ben Franklin, etc.,
Ass'n, 51 Ind. 271......201, 315, 471
American Ins. Co. v. Henley, 60
Ind. 515...
...210, 211
Amory v. Reilly, 9 Ind. 490.........206
Armory v. Delamirie, 1 Stra. 505..288
Armstead v. Thomas, 9 Ala. 586...125 Arnoux v. Homans, 25 How. Pr.
Borum v. Fouts, 15 Ind. 50
Bottorf v. Conner, 1 Blackf. 287...206
Bowen v. Fisher, 14 Ind. 104.......206
Bowen v. Phillips, 55 Ind. 226....276
Bradford v. State, 15 Ind. 347......309
Bradley v. State, 31 Ind. 492....... 56
Bradshaw v. Omaha, 1 Neb. 16....208
Brandon v. Planters, etc., Bank, 1
Stewart, 320......
.291
.499 Brannon v. May, 42 Ind. 92.. .....555 Bridges v. Hawkesworth, 7 Eng. L. & Eq. 424...
Brookbank v. City of Jeffersonville,
41 Ind. 406.
Brooks v. Berryhill, 20 Ind. 97.. .455
Brooks v. Harris, 41 Ind. 390......450
Baker v. Riley, 16 Ind. 479...119, 450 Brownfield v. Weicht, 9 Ind. 394..192
Baldey v. Parker, 2 B. & C. 37.....490 Brumfield v. Palmer, 7 Blackf.
Baldwin v. Salter, 8 Paige, 473....499
Banks v. Werts, 13 Ind. 203........367 Bryant v. Rudisell, 4 Heisk. 656...125 Bargis v. State, 4 Ind. 126 39 Buck v. Havens, 40 Ind. 221.... .357
Barker v. Buell, 35 Ind. 297 ...316 Bucklen v. Huff, 53 Ind. 474.
Barnett's Appeal,46 Pa.State, 392..584 Buckner v. State, 56 Ind. 207
Barney v. Clark, 46 N. H. 514.....125 Burkam v. Fitch, 51 Ind. 375
Bates v. Spooner, 45 Ind. 489. .....381 Busen bark v. Etchison Ditching
Bayler v. Commonwealth, 40 Pa. Ass'n, 62 Ind. 314.
State, 37
96 Bush v. Brown, 49 Ind. 573
Beard v. State, 54 Ind. 413.......... 436 Byrket v. Monohon, 7 Blackf. 83..225
Carpenter v. Carpenter, 45 Ind. Cox v. State, 49 Ind. 568...... ......
142...
..114 Craig v. Secrist, 54 Ind. 419...119, 450
Carpenter v. Dame, 10 Ind. 125...309 Crawford v. Crockett, 55 Ind. 220..114
Carpenter v. Vanscoten, 20 Ind.50. 10 Crawford v. Gaulden, 33 Ga. 172...125
Carrick v. State, 18 Ind. 409.... 49 Crosby v. Jeroloman, 37 Ind. 264..367
Case v. Bumstead, 24 Ind. 429......206 Cross v. O'Donnell, 44 N. Y. 661...593
Caulkins v. Hellman, 47 N.Y. 449..593 Crouse v. Holman, 19 Ind. 30......313
Chapin v. Osborn, 29 Ind. 99.... .182 Crow v. State, 24 Tex. 12...
Chapman v. Harwood, 8 Blackf. Cummins v. Butler, 3 Blackf. 190..220
Cunningham v. State, 35 Ind. 373. 49
82.
.174
Chouteau v. Sherman, 11 Mo. 385..381
Christy v. Holmes, 57 Ind. 314..... 85
Churchman v.Martin, 54 Ind. 380. 82
Cincinnati, etc., R. R. Co. v. Eaton,
53 Ind. 307... .............. 306, 568
Citizens, etc., R. W. Co. v. Carey,
56 Ind. 396.
Davenport v. Barnett, 51 Ind. 329.400
Davis v. Barger, 57 Ind. 54
Dawson v. State, 52 Ind. 478.
Dawson v. Vaughan, 42 Ind. 395..181
Deam v.
Dawson, 62 Ind. 22.........257
Detrick v. McGlone, 46 Ind. 291...478
Dibblee v. Mitchell, 15 Ind. 435...206
1.316 Dickinson v. Hall, 14 Pick. 217...477
City of Delphi v. Bowen,61 Ind.29.427 | Dill v. O'Ferrell, 45 Ind. 268.................
City of Delphi v. Evans,36 Ind.90.551
City of Huntington v. Day, 55 Ind.
7
City of Indianapolis v. Lawyer, 38
Ind. 348
City of Logansport v. Legg, 20
Ind. 315..
City of Logansport v. Seybold, 59
Ind. 225.....
209, 212
City of Peru v. Bearss, 55 Ind. 576.209
Claflin v. Dawson, 58 Ind. 408..... 84 Clark v. Benefiel, 18 Ind 405...... 394 Clark v. Henry, 2 Cow. 332. .502 Clarke v. State, 34 Ind. 436 .........390
Clem v. State, 31 Ind. 480.
Clem v. State, 42 Ind. 420
322......
96
Emmett v. Yandes, 60 Ind. 548 ... 87
..403 Emmons v. Meeker, 55 Ind. 321. 406
..114 Etchison, etc., Ass'n v. Hillis, 40
Ind. 408....
201, 315
.399 Etter v. Armstrong, 46 Ind. 197.. 46, Combs v. Etter, 49 Ind. 535. ....255 314
Comer v. Himes, 49 Ind. 482.......555 Evans v. Goodlet, 1 Blackf. 246...206
Commonwealth v. Lowell G. L. Evans v. Hamilton, 56 Ind. 34.....170
Co., 12 Allen, 75.
69 Evans v. State, 7 Ind. 271
Commonwealth v. Squire, 1 Met. Evansville, etc., R. R. Co. v. Snapp, 61 Ind. 3(3 ...210, 211
Excelsior, etc., Co. v. Brown, 38
Ind. 384....
« PreviousContinue » |