Page images
PDF
EPUB

OF

CASES ARGUED AND DETERMINED

IN THE

SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE

OF THE

STATE OF INDIANA,

WITH TABLES OF THE CASES REPORTED AND CASES
CITED AND STATUTES CITED AND CONSTRUED

AND AN INDEX.

By SIDNEY R. MOON,

OFFICIAL REPORTER.

DANIEL W. CROCKETT, First Asst. Reporter.

LEE W. MOON, Second Asst. Reporter.

VOL. 136.

CONTAINING CASES DECIDED AT THE NOVEMBER TERM, 1893, AND NOT

PUBLISHED IN VOLUME 135,

INDIANAPOLIS:
CARLON & HOLLENBECK, CONTRACTORS FOR THE STATE.

[ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]

TABLE OF THE CASES

REPORTED IN THIS VOLUME.

595

Allen v. Northwestern Mutual Cooper, by Next Friend,v. Lak
Life Insurance Co .......

...........608 Erie and Western R. R. Co...366

Cooper et al., Offutt v... ...701 Balue v.

Taylor et al...............368 Corbin et al., Bell et al. V........269 Barns et al., McCoy et al. V.....378 Cornett et al. v. Hough et al...387 Bass v. State ..

.165 Beaver et al., Fulp v....

.319 Davis et al., Board of CommisBeaver v. Fulp

sioners of Vigo County v......503 Bell et al. y. Corbin et al., ..269 Davis, by Next Friend,v. Shuah

et al...

.:237 Berkey, Admr., Louisville, New

Albany and Chicago R. W. Denton et al.v. Thompson et al..446 Co. V.... ..181

9

Dixon, Stalcup et al. v... Berkey,Louisville, New Albany

Doren v. Gillum, Sheriff, et al..134 and Chicago R. W. Co. v......591 Duckwall et al. v. Kisner et al., 99 Black, Lime City Building,Loan Dyer et al. v. Eldridge et al.....654 and Savings Assn. V .544

Eberling v. State

....117 Black v. Thompson

,611 Blake, City of Terre Haute y...636 Elliott et al. v. Pontius et al....641

Eldridge et al., Dyer et al. v ...654 Blake et al. v. Minkner et al...418 Evansville and Terre Haute R. Board of Commissioners of Vigo

R. Co., Wolfe V..........

.383 County v. Davis et al ...........503 Board of Commissioners of Vigo Farmers' and Merchants’ Bank County v. Stout et al............. 53

of Attica, Ind., et al., RobBoard of Commissioners of erts v...

..154 White County v. Gwin, Sher

Ferguson et al. v. Hull et al.....339 iff, et al .....

..562 Fidelity and Casualty Company Board of Commissioners of

of New York v. Teter...........672 Warren County, State, ex Fleming v. State.... rel. Starry, V...

.207 Freshour et al., Williams et al.v..361 Boone, Admr., et al., Wilson v..142 Fulp v. Beaver et al... .319 Bowen, Woodruff, Admx., V...431 Fulp, Beaver v ......... .595 Bruce, Treasurer, v. Cook et al..214

Gillum, Sheriff, et al., Doren v..134 Carmichael, King V...

20 Goodbar et al. v. Lidikey et al.. 1 Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Grames, Cincinnati, Indianap

Louis and Chicago R. W. Co. olis, St. Louis and Chicago R. v. Grames.. 39 W. Co. V........

39 City of Terre Haute v. Blake...636 Graves et al. v. State, ex rel. City of Valparaiso et al., Rob Cole, Auditor of Harrison inson et al. v... .616 County....

..406 Clausmeier, Smith v.

.105 Gwin, Sheriff, et al., Board of Coapstick, Orb et ux. v ...........313 Commissioners of White Cook et al., Bruce, Treasurer, v..214 County v....

...562

.149

......198

Hawkins v. State............ .630 | Parker et al. v. State........... .284 Helms et al., State, ex rel. Cun Peckham et al., State, ex rel. ningham, V..

.122 Coleman, V...... Hertsch et al., State, ex rel. Pennsylvania Co. v. Meyers, Howard, Prosecuting Attor Admx...

.242 ney, v......

.293 Pennsylvania Co. v. Sears.. .460 Hough et al., Cornett et al. v...387 Perkins et al. v. McConnell et Hull et al., Ferguson et al. V...339 al ........

.384

Peterson, New Pittsburgh Coal Jackson et al. v. Neal..............173 and Coke Co. V....

.398

Phillips et al., Milburn v.........680 Kennedy et al. v.Warnica et al..161 Pontius et al., Elliott et al. v...641 Kentucky and Indiana Bridge Co., State v.

.195 Roberts v. Farmers' and MerKepler et al. v. Wright et al.... 77 chants’ Bank of Attica, Ind., King v. Carmichael... 20 et al......

.....154 Kingen v. Stroh ....... ..610 Robinson et al. v. City of ValKisner et al., Duckwall et al. v.. 99 paraiso et al.....

..616

V...

.233 Sego v.

al. V

[ocr errors]

Lake Erie and Western R. R. Schwier et al. y. Zitike et al.....210 Co., Cooper, by Next Friend, Sears, Pennsylvania Co. V....... 460

.366 Sego v. State, ex rel. Stoddard..700 Layelle y. State....

Stoddard....

.297 Laycock v. State...

.217 Shuah et al., Davis, by Next Lidikey et al., Goodbar et al. v.. 1 Friend, V.....

.237 Lime City Building, Loan and Shuck v. State, ex rel. Cope..... 63

Savings Assn. v. Black.........544 Shultz v. Shultz et al..... .323 Little, Guar., McCrory et al. v.. 86 Sims v. State..

.358 Louisville, New Albany and Smith v. Clausmeier.

.105 Chicago R.W.Co. v. Berkey..591 Spencer v. Spencer....

414 Louisville, New Albany and Stalcup et al. v. Dixon....

9 Chicago R.W. Co. v. Berkey, Starkey et al. v. Starkey. ..349 Admr ..181 State, Bass V....

165 State, Eberling .....

.117 Martin v. McCullough, Admr..331 State, Fleming V.....

.149 McClanahan v. Williams et al.. 30 State, Hawkins v....

.630 McConnell et al., Perkins et State v. Kentucky and Indiana

.384
Bridge Co.......

.195 McCorkle, Thompson v.... .481 State, Lavelle v.. McCoy et al. v. Barns et al......378 State, Laycock v...

217 McCrory et al. v. Little, Guar.. 86 State, Palmer V.....

.393 McCullough, Admr., Martin v..331 State, Parker et al. v..

284 McDaneld v. McDaneld et al...603 State, Sims v

.358 McFall et al. v. McFall et al...622 State, Walker v...

..663 Meyers, Admx., Pennsylvania State, White v....

..308 Co. V......

.... 242 State, ex rel. Cole, Auditor of Milburn v. Phillips et al ........680 Harrison County, Graves et Minkner et al., Blake et al. v...418

al. V....

.....406

State, ex rel. Coleman, v. PeckNeal, Jackson et al. V..............173 ham et al....

.198 New Pittsburgh Coal and Coke State, ex rel. Cope, Shuck v..... 63 Co. v. Peterson...

..398 State, ex rel. Cunningham, v. Northwestern Mutual Life In Helms et al.......

122 surance Co., Allen ............608 State, ex rel. Howard, Prose

cuting Attorney, v. Hertsch Offutt v. Cooper et al ........... .701 et al......

.293 Ohio Falls Car Co., Wood V.....598 State, ex rel. Starry, v. Board Orb et ux. v. Coapstick. ..313 of Commissioners of Warren

County..

...........207 Palmer v. State.......

.393 State, ex rel. Stoddard, Sego v..700

Stoddard, Sego V....... .297 | Warnica et al., Kennedy et al. Stout et al., Board of Commis

.161 sioners of Vigo County v...... 53 White v. State.

..308 Stroh, Kingen v

.610 Williams et al. v. Freshour et al...

..........361 Taylor et al., Balue v. .368 Williams et al., McClanahan v. 30 Teter, Fidelity and Casualty Wilson v. Boone, Admr., et al..142

Company of New York v......672 Wolfe v. Evansville and Terre Thompson, Black_v... ..611 Haute R. R. Co........... ..383 Thompson et al., Denton et al. Wood y. Ohio Falls Car Co......598

.446 Woodruff, Admx., v. Bowen ...431 Thompson v. McCorkle .484 Wright et al., Kepler et al. v... 77 Walker v. State....... .....663 Zitike et al., Schwier et al. v...210

[ocr errors]
« PreviousContinue »