OF OHIO CASES PUBLISHED IN THE WEEKLY LAW BULLETIN VOLUMES 24-30. REPRINTED FOR THE OHIO DECISIONS SERIES OF OHIO CASE LAW BOOKS. This volume is to be cited as 11 OHIO DECISIONS REPRINT, or, abbreviated, 11 O. D. Re. KFC NORWALK, OHIO; THE LANING PRINTING COMPANY 1899. Entered According to Act of Congress in the year 1899 By THE LANING PRINTING COMPANY In the Office of the Librarian, at Washington. OCT 6 1931 Arnkens v. Rouse ...... v. Pogue....... v. Inc. Plane Ry. Co........ Antonelle, Helm & Co. v. Huston & Freeman...24, 29.. Armstrong v. Herancourt Brewing Co... Armstrong v. Law.................... Aylmore v. State... Barnes, In re....... Barney v. Swift..... & Smith Co. v. Com'rs...... Barr v. Chapman........... 25, 289...... 81 ..220 .... 5 ..26, 39. ..297 .27, 100. ....461 ..26, 221...... ....380 Barr's Will, In re. Belle Centre v. Welsh.. Bell v. Miller ... Bennett v. Fire Ins. Co..... ....25, 126.. .27, 15. Board of Review, in re....... .27, 334. . 41 ...163 .429 .....570 Bonebrake v. Wall ...... Branch v. Wesleyan Cem. Directors.... Brooks v. Cable Co......... Brush Electric Light Co. v. Cincinnati.. Buse V. Cincinnati.... .29, 284.... ..785 Hall v. Citizens Mut. Live Stock Ass'n............25, 79....... Harner v. Columbus St. Ry. Co........... Harper v. Dalzell, Gilmore & Leighton Co........27, 274 Hershisher v. Williams...... .24, 314..... ... 76 ....25, 425.. ..281 ...760 Holmes & Booth v. Holland......... .29, 115......... ....768 Hooven & Allison Co. v. Nat. Cordage Co.........27, 18..... |