Destabilizing Theory: Contemporary Feminist Debates
In the past decade the central principles of western feminist theory have been dramatically challenged. many feminists have endorsed post-structuralism's rejection of essentialist theoretical categories, and have added a powerful gender dimension to contemporary critiques of modernity. Earlier 'women' have been radically undermined, and newer concerns with 'difference', 'identity', and 'power' have emerged. Destabilizing Theory explores these developments in a set of specially commissioned essays by feminist theorists. Does this change amount to a real shift within feminist theory, or will feminism's links with an emancipatory modernism reinstate an older political agenda? Can we transcend the common counterposition of equality and difference, or is feminism condemned to argue within the terms of this binary opposition?
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
abstract analysis argues arguments artist become body called capitalism challenge claims common complex concept concern constituted constructed contemporary context critical critique culture debate defined desire difference discourse discussion distinction division dominant effect equality essay ethnic example experience female femininity feminism feminist forms Foucault gender given human identity important individual interests involved issues labour language lesbian liberal London Lubaina Himid male Marxism masculine meaning modernist movement nature notion object offered oppression original painting particular patriarchy political position possible post-modern practices present Press problem produced question race radical reading reference relations represent representation rhetoric sense sexual sexual difference shift significant social society space speak specific structures struggles studies suggest theory Third thought tion tradition translation understanding University western woman women writing